Back to thoughts

Ranking

Coding Agents Ranking by Sho

My personal ranking for the peak of vibe coding: tools capable of going from a prompt to a functional product, with real control over the live code. I separate GUI and CLI because they don't compete on the same ground.

Ranking view

Living history

My agents ranking, month by month

May 2026 was the first cut. In June I only moved GUI. In July the GUI order holds and Grok Build enters CLI. Switch the view to compare how each mode evolves.

Visual environment: IDE, integrated chat, and design-to-code flows.

GUI history of the personal coding agents ranking GUI: confirmed history for May, June, and July 2026, with a dotted expectation line through August. In July 2026 the order holds: Cursor first, Codex second, Claude Code third, Antigravity fourth. #1 #2 #3 #4 May 2026 June 2026 July 2026 August 2026 1. Cursor 3. Claude Code 2. Codex 4. Antigravity
Position 1 is my main recommendation for Prompt to Product in GUI. Solid lines are confirmed history; dotted lines are a visual expectation through August. The current ladder reflects the July 2026 cut.
UXers
Cursor · Design, visual orchestration, and control of the live product.
Developers
Claude Code · Technical depth, terminal, subagents, and complex context.
Logic
Codex · Precision for logic and a more conversational interaction.
Pricing
Antigravity · Generous access to get started without a subscription.

Quick read

The key difference by mode

Prompt to Product · GUI

Current top · July 2026

For me, this level is above Prompt to UI. Tools like Figma Make or Lovable help with prototyping, but they usually deliver something packaged. These agents compete because they let you work on the real product.

  1. Best for UXers

    Cursor

    The friendliest and most powerful way for a designer to step into live code.

    Cursor wins because it translates the creative flow into a real development environment: VS Code, integrated browser, Plan Mode, Design Mode, and parallel agents.

    Familiar interfacePlan ModeDesign ModeIntegrated browserParallel agents

    Trade-off: Its power lies in orchestrating design and code in a single place.

  2. Best for Logic

    Codex

    A middle ground between freedom, precision, and a more conversational experience.

    Codex stands out for the quality of its coding model and a more chat-like interface, with precise results for logic and an increasingly better reading of local projects.

    Chat-like interfacePrecise logicAdvanced GPTLocal detectionGood balance

    Trade-off: Its proposition is strong, but it still feels less integrated into the visual flow than Cursor.

  3. Best for Developers

    Claude Code

    The strongest agent when the work demands technical depth and terminal.

    Claude Code is the place a technical profile keeps coming back to: it understands complex contexts, works very well from the CLI, and can orchestrate subagents for simultaneous tasks.

    Powerful CLIComplex contextSubagentsArtifactsDeep refactors

    Trade-off: For a designer it can feel more cumbersome at first because it lives closer to the terminal.

  4. Best for Pricing

    Antigravity

    The most accessible option to start without paying a subscription yet.

    Antigravity makes the ranking for its generosity: it lets you get going, try powerful models, and build landings or plugins without initial financial friction.

    Generous free tierMultiple modelsGood startLanding pagesPlugins

    Trade-off: It still trails Cursor in interface polish, but it's a great entry point.